What exactly is Loganix?

A link building and SEO fulfilment provider whose main customer is the SEO agency. You brief the campaign and their team sources and places the links.

Is Loganix a marketplace?

No. There is no catalogue of sites to browse and filter. That is a real difference, not a detail: it decides whether you can audit cost per outlet before you spend.

It positions as premium, so the cost per placement sits above a self-service catalogue. Whether that is expensive depends on what your own time sourcing sites is worth .

Loganix or Authority Builders?

Both sell outreach-based placements to agencies. Authority Builders also offers a guest post service where you get access to the sites, which is the closest either comes to a catalogue.

Loganix or a managed service?

Both are fulfilment. Ours, from €500 a month, differs in one thing that matters when you are reselling to a client: you see and approve the media proposal , so you can tell your client exactly where the links are going before they go.

Guide and alternatives · updated for 2026

Alternatives to Loganix

Loganix sells premium link building to SEO agencies and in-house teams that want to hand the work off. That is a fair thing to want — the question is whether handing it off also means giving up the say over where your links land.

Analysis based on the platform's own public sources

Agencies: Its stated core customer, alongside SMBs
Premium: How it positions its placements
Service: The unit you buy, not the individual outlet
Global: Its stated reach for agency clients

What is Loganix?

Loganix is a link building and SEO fulfilment provider whose stated customer is the SEO agency. Its site frames the value as handing off the tasks an agency does not want to keep in-house, across link building, PPC and content.

It positions on the premium end: fewer, better placements rather than volume. That fits a customer who is reselling the work and whose own reputation rides on the quality of the output.

As with every fulfilment model, the sourcing is theirs. You bring the target and the criteria; the sites are their side of the deal.

How does it work?

A fulfilment flow rather than a catalogue.

If you are an agency

You outsource the delivery and keep the client relationship.

Brief the campaign and the targets.
Agree criteria and volume.
Their team sources and places.
You report the results to your client.

If you are in-house

You buy the same fulfilment without the agency in the middle.

Define what you need moved.
Hand over the brief.
Review the placements delivered.
Repeat, or take sourcing back in-house.

Pros and limitations

A balanced read of what it offers.

What works well

Clear focus on quality over volume.
Built around the agency as a customer, with the reporting that implies.
Takes real work off a small team's plate.
Covers more than links, so one vendor can serve several needs.

Where it falls short

No public catalogue to compare outlets or prices.
Premium positioning means a higher cost per placement.
You depend on their sourcing for how relevant each link is.
Hard to scale a campaign quickly without renegotiating.

Loganix vs Growwer

Fulfilment you brief against a catalogue you filter.

	Loganix	Growwer
If you want it run for you	Briefed campaign, outlets chosen for you	Managed service from €500/month, and you approve the media list before anything runs
Model	Link building fulfilment for agencies	Marketplace you browse yourself
Who picks the outlet	Their team	You, from the catalogue
Price visibility	Per campaign or service	Per outlet, before you buy
Catalogue	Not public	41,000+ outlets
Positioning	Premium, quality over volume	Pick your own quality bar per outlet
Speed to scale	Depends on their sourcing	Immediate, the catalogue is live

Growwer is our platform. Loganix's figures come from its public site.

Other alternatives

Services and platforms worth weighing, whichever way you buy.

Frequently asked questions

A link building and SEO fulfilment provider whose main customer is the SEO agency. You brief the campaign and their team sources and places the links.
No. There is no catalogue of sites to browse and filter. That is a real difference, not a detail: it decides whether you can audit cost per outlet before you spend.
It positions as premium, so the cost per placement sits above a self-service catalogue. Whether that is expensive depends on what your own time sourcing sites is worth.
Both sell outreach-based placements to agencies. Authority Builders also offers a guest post service where you get access to the sites, which is the closest either comes to a catalogue.
Both are fulfilment. Ours, from €500 a month, differs in one thing that matters when you are reselling to a client: you see and approve the media proposal, so you can tell your client exactly where the links are going before they go.